What the Hari kerfuffle is really about

Seen from close up the Johann Hari kerfuffle is about accusations of plagiarism, churnalism and therefore the trust in one of Britain’s foremost journalists.

It’s a fair debate, and with Hari’s response and apology today, one I hope will  naturally quieten down soon enough.

But seen from a step back what I feel this is really about is our society grappling and coming to terms with the new transparency that is afforded by the Internet.

The massively connectedness of the internet, the memory storage and recall of technology, and the human intelligence and diverse motivations and interests that reside in our social networks mean that we are in a new age of transparency.

In my opinion we are still only reaching the very earliest and most basic understanding of what this means for our lives and for the world around us.

Related and connected examples must include:

Yesterday I gave a talk at the PR Week ‘Ultimate Crisis Conference’ where I floated the idea that we are entering an Age of Crises.

For me, until we reach a new equilibrium in society – which will include a better understanding of transparency, changed behaviour in ourselves, and adjusted expectations in what we consider to be normal and abnormal behaviour in others – we can expect more of crises like these.

More of the great and the good being challenged, half found out (or not), memos leaked, personal spicy emails massively circulated. Learning the hard way, all of us to some extent, at scale, and in public.

I have no idea how long this will last.

The Hari affair is just another step on the road towards a better understanding of what it is to live in this new world we have created…

One thought on “What the Hari kerfuffle is really about

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s